In face of changing climate, major wildlife group calls for renewable energy
Climate change is altering and destroying important habitats that America’s migratory birds depend on and urgent action is needed to change that dangerous "flight path," including rapid development of renewable energy sources, according to a new report released yesterday by the National Wildlife Federation (NWF).
Shifting Skies: Migratory Birds in a Warming World details how a warming climate could lead to a decline in some bird populations and even some extinctions if action is not taken to curb carbon pollution and adopt climate-smart conservation strategies.
The report's foreword, by NWF President and CEO Larry Schweiger, says, "The climate crisis is already changing the playing field for birds, other wildlife and their habitats across America. Urgent action is needed to preserve America’s conservation legacy ... We must address the underlying cause of climate change by reducing our carbon pollution and quickly transitioning to cleaner, more secure sources of energy."
Among the report's key recommendations: "Invest in clean energy and reduce dependence on dirty fuels. Properly-sited wind, solar, geothermal and sustainable bioenergy will reduce our consumption of carbon-polluting fuels like coal, oil, tar sands and natural gas, which are driving climate change." [emphasis added] NWF has previously called for half of U.S. energy to come from renewable energy sources by 2030.
In a special section on "Wind Energy and Birds," the report calls for "strong wildlife safeguards to protect sensitive species and habitats during the siting, construction, and operation of wind energy projects both on and offshore," and lists several initiatives--all of which have involved active participation by AWEA and wind energy companies:
- The American Wind Wildlife Institute—a multi-stakeholder collaboration—is supporting research, analytical tools, and development of best practices for responsible wind energy development.
- The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is implementing voluntary wind energy guidelines for wildlife at projects throughout the country.
- Coordinating with stakeholders, the U.S. Interior Department is developing much needed guidance and conservation programming for wind energy’s potential impact on protected bald and golden eagles.
- Leading wind energy developers are working with federal and state agencies to develop a conservation plan for imperiled birds of the Great Plains, such as the whooping crane and lesser prairie chicken.
- Federal land managers are establishing pre-screened, low-conflict offshore 'Wind Energy Areas.'"
Shifting Skies explains that migratory birds face unique challenges because each season they require different places to live, often thousands of miles apart, to raise their young, migrate and overwinter. At least 350 species in North America fly to South or Central America every fall and return in the spring. The report describes how climate change is adversely affecting bird behavior and includes specific examples in many regions of the U.S.:
- Birds’ ranges are shifting and in some cases, contracting. More than half (177) of 305 species tracked have shifted their centers of abundance during the winter northward by 35 miles on average in the past four decades.
- Coastal wetlands and beach habitats, home to birds like king rails and piping plovers, are disappearing, inundated by sea level rise.
- Global warming is exacerbating pests and disease, such as mountain pine beetle epidemics that have devastated many western forests.
- Changing precipitation patterns threaten the Midwest’s prairie pothole region, known as "America’s duck factory." Many ducks such as mallards and pintails face disappearing breeding habitat.
In addition to development of renewable energy sources, the report recommends other concrete steps to "curb climate change and its impacts on migratory birds, such as sea level rise, wildfires, drought and more extreme weather events," as follows:
"- Reduce carbon pollution under the Clean Air Act. While the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate industrial carbon pollution has been approved by the Supreme Court and repeatedly upheld by Congress, the Obama administration has not yet set carbon pollution limits. It’s time to act.
"- Protect and restore natural carbon sinks. Restoring the ability of farms, forests and other natural lands to absorb and store carbon provides increased benefits to birds and other wildlife by providing important habitat, as well as helping to mitigate climate change.
"- Use climate-smart conservation strategies to protect sensitive habitats and restore degraded areas. Land and water protection efforts increasingly will need to take future climate projections into account to ensure long-term value to birds and other wildlife. Degraded landscapes need to be restored, and citizens can take action to provide important habitat through backyard and schoolyard habitat programs."
"From backyard wildlife watchers to hunters in their duck blinds, unless we take action now, Americans across the country are going to be asking ‘what happened to all the birds,'" said Dr. Alan Wentz, retired chief conservation officer of Ducks Unlimited and current board member of the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. “We know the steps we need to take to safeguard not just birds but all wildlife, our communities, and current and future generations of Americans from climate change. Now it’s time for action."
According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2012 was America’s hottest year on record. Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels hit 400 parts per million in May 2013, a concentration not seen on Earth for 3 million years.
"Targeted investments in climate-smart conservation strategies can deliver huge returns for America’s communities and wildlife," said Lynn Scarlett, former Deputy Secretary and Chief Operating Officer of the Interior Department from 2005 to 2009. "We’ll need to work together to solve these challenges, not just across local, state, and federal boundaries, but across party lines."
Related articles:Fact check: 5 things the AP missed in its recent coverage of wind energy, May 14, 2013
Fact check: More misinformation from Bryce on wind and birds, March 25, 2013
Fact check: Spectator (U.K.) overlooks facts on wind power and wildlife, January 15, 2013
Fact check: FOX News article fails to put wind development in context, January 2, 2013
Fact check: CFACT's Driessen wildly off base on bird claims, December 24, 2012
118 sportsmen's and conservation groups urge Congress to extend wind tax credits, December 6, 2012
Wind-wildlife meeting highlights wind industry's proactive approach, December 3, 2012
Fact check: Voice of America article on wind and birds lacks context, November 2, 2012
Sage-grouse collaborative to fund two wind-related studies, August 13, 2012
Fact check: Wired story bypasses wind industry's efforts on bats, July 10, 2012
Opinion: Wind energy threat to eagles relatively low, June 26, 2012
Fact check: Bond bashes wind, mangles facts [UPDATED], June 19, 2012
American Wind Wildlife Institute releases white paper on eagles and wind power, May 25, 2012
Already following federal bird guidelines, wind co. says, March 29, 2012
Fact check: Bryce missteps on wind and birds, March 8, 2012
Colorado collaboration: Wind companies, conservation groups agree on wildlife best practices, February 6, 2012
The Fish & Wildlife Eagle Permit Rule: Our perspective, January 10, 2012
Wind power's impact on birds: modest, December 15, 2011
Bird fatalities at Laurel Mountain substation, November 9, 2011
Birds and wind: Bad news leads, good news in weeds, August 29, 2011
Fact check: Fox News off base on bird collisions, August 19, 2011
News story draws questionable conclusions from eagle collisions with old turbines, June 6, 2011
WINDPOWER report: Whooping cranes may avoid wind farms, more research ahead, May 25, 2011
Wind developer launches intensive avian monitoring program, May 23, 2011
AWEA files comments on "unworkable" U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service guidelines, May 19, 2011
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, AWEA, wind developers sign agreement to promote endangered species conservation, April 20, 2011
Wind industry backs research on bat concerns including White-Nose Syndrome, April 1, 2011
Wind turbine bird threat modest, January 18, 2011
Editorial: How serious is threat to birds?, January 5, 2011
Wind energy and birds: No double standard, September 9, 2009
Wind-wildlife group names first president, February 24, 2009
Get Email Updates
Did you know?
Wind energy, on certain days, has produced over 60% of the electricity on certain power systems in the U.S.Tweet this
A typical modern wind turbine produces 17 times more electricity than the typical turbine did in 1990.Tweet this
- Tweet this
The U.S. wind industry has invested $18 billion a year on average over the last 5 years in U.S. projects.Tweet this
- Tweet this
- Tweet this
It would take the fuel of a coal train 9,000 miles long (enough to cross the U.S. 3 times) to produce as much electricity as U.S. wind turbines generated this year.Tweet this
Wind energy installed 36.5% of all new electric generating capacity in America over the past 5 years, more than coal and nuclear combined, and wind was the single largest source of new power during 2012.Tweet this
- Tweet this
- Tweet this
- Tweet this
Unlike nearly every other form of energy, wind uses virtually no water – conserving over 37 billion gallons of water each year, about 120 gallons per capita, or the equivalent of 286 billion bottles of water.Tweet this
U.S. wind energy development is currently on track to reach the goal of producing 20% of America’s electricity by 2030.Tweet this
It would take 319 million barrels of oil (over 13 billion gallons) to generate as much electricity as U.S. wind turbines will generate this year.Tweet this
- Tweet this
At $3.30 per gallon, driving today costs you 14 cents a mile, while running an electric car on wind power costs less than 2 cents a mile. It’s like paying 35 cents a gallon at the pump!Tweet this
Each typical wind turbine brings over $3,000 in added income each year to farmers and ranchers, while allowing continued use of their land.Tweet this
- Tweet this
- Tweet this